Improve "Kenntnisse von Vorschriften" explanations

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-04 11:59:48 +02:00
parent fdc5932d7d
commit 3ce060947d
3 changed files with 207 additions and 201 deletions
+12 -6
View File
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Every entry MUST have exactly these four fields:
| Field | Type | Constraint |
|---------------|---------|--------------------------------------------|
| `revision` | integer | `>= 1`. Starts at `1`, bumps on improvement |
| `explanation` | string | Non-empty. **English.** Terse. WHY-focused |
| `explanation` | string | Non-empty. **English.** Correct & helpful, WHY-focused |
| `source` | string | Non-empty. URL or citation like `AFuV §16(2)` |
| `confidence` | integer | `1..10` inclusive. See scale in §5 |
@@ -141,10 +141,15 @@ source citation.
- **Language: English.** The questions and answers stay in German
on the card; the explanation is the one English element. Don't
switch.
- **Terse.** Aim for 13 sentences. The card already shows the
question, the correct answer text, and the breadcrumb — the
explanation should add the missing *why*, not restate any of
those.
- **Correct and helpful first; length follows the topic.** There is
no sentence cap. Use as much room as the question genuinely needs —
a one-line arithmetic restatement for a simple lookup, a full
worked derivation or a multi-step rule walkthrough where that is
what makes the answer *click*. Don't pad: every sentence should
earn its place by adding correctness, context, or a usable hook.
The card already shows the question, the correct answer text, and
the breadcrumb — the explanation adds the missing *why* and the
understanding needed to get there, not a restatement of those.
- **Lead with the reasoning.** Don't open with "The correct answer
is X because..." — the card already declares the correct answer
one line above. Go straight to the principle, the formula, the
@@ -406,7 +411,8 @@ Before saving, confirm:
- [ ] Key is the exact catalog `number` (case-sensitive).
- [ ] All four fields present, correct types, in range.
- [ ] `explanation` is English, terse, WHY-focused.
- [ ] `explanation` is English, correct, helpful, WHY-focused — as
long as the topic needs, no longer.
- [ ] `source` is non-empty and as primary as possible.
- [ ] `revision` is correct (1 for new, bumped for improvement).
- [ ] `confidence` honestly reflects how well the source supports